|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Challenging "Resistance to Change"
Eric B. Dent
Susan Galloway Goldberg
The George Washington University
This article examines the origins of one of the most widely accepted mental models that drives organizational behavior: the idea that there is resistance to change and that managers must overcome it. This mental model, held by employees at all levels, interferes with successful change implementation. The authors trace the emergence of the term resistance to change and show how it became received truth. Kurt Lewin introduced the term as a systems concept, as a force affecting managers and employees equally. Because the terminology, but not the context, was carried forward, later uses increasingly cast the problem as a psychological concept, personalizing the issue as employees versus managers. Acceptance of this model confuses an understanding of change dynamics. Letting go of the term—and the model it has come to embody—will make way for more useful models of change dynamics. The authors conclude with a discussion of alternatives to resistance to change.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 35, No. 1,
25-41 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886399351003
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J. D. Ford and L. W. Ford
Conversational Profiles: A Tool for Altering the Conversational Patterns of Change Managers
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
December 1, 2008;
44(4):
445 - 467.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Hussain and K. Hafeez
Changing Attitudes and Behavior of Stakeholders During an Information Systems-Led Organizational Change
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
December 1, 2008;
44(4):
490 - 513.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Waterhouse, N. Ryan, T. Williams, and M. B. Charles
Market Responsiveness versus Political Responsiveness: Change and Conflict in an Australian Government Agency
Public Policy and Administration,
October 1, 2008;
23(4):
351 - 372.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Detert and T. G. Pollock
Values, Interests, and the Capacity to Act: Understanding Professionals' Responses to Market-Based Improvement Initiatives in Highly Institutionalized Organizations
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
June 1, 2008;
44(2):
186 - 214.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Hornung and D. M. Rousseau
Active on the Job Proactive in Change: How Autonomy at Work Contributes to Employee Support for Organizational Change
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
December 1, 2007;
43(4):
401 - 426.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Burnes
Kurt Lewin and the Harwood Studies: The Foundations of OD
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
June 1, 2007;
43(2):
213 - 231.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. B. Meyer
Destructive Dynamics of Middle Management Intervention in Postmerger Processes
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
December 1, 2006;
42(4):
397 - 419.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Eilam and B. Shamir
Organizational Change and Self-Concept Threats: A Theoretical Perspective and a Case Study
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
December 1, 2005;
41(4):
399 - 421.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. S. Taylor
Special Education and Private Schools: Principals' Points of View
Remedial and Special Education,
October 1, 2005;
26(5):
281 - 296.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Thomas and A. Davies
What Have the Feminists Done for Us? Feminist Theory and Organizational Resistance
Organization,
September 1, 2005;
12(5):
711 - 740.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Lines
The Structure and Function of Attitudes Toward Organizational Change
Human Resource Development Review,
March 1, 2005;
4(1):
8 - 32.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chee Meng Tham and J. M. Werner
Designing and Evaluating E-Learning in Higher Education: A Review and Recommendations
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies,
January 1, 2005;
11(2):
15 - 25.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
