|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Tensions Between Research and Intervention in Intergroup Conflict
Roy J. Lewicki
Amos Tuck School of Business Administration, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Clayton P. Alderfer
Department of Administrative Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
One of the greatest problems facing the applied behavioral scientist is the conflict between intervening in a system in order to change it and collecting research data on the system and the impact of his intervention. The interventionist-as-researcher often experiences pressures from the system to ignore certain kinds of data, to avoid certain people, or to accept its own diagnosis of its problems and their solution. The researcher-as-interventionist must likewise deal with several problems: system members become' "subjects" rather than clients, unplanned interventions threaten the coherence of his research design, and field settings themselves often give rise to data collection and analysis difficulties. This case study reports an attempt to intervene in an intergroup relationship and explores two basic problems: the tensions between research and intervention, and the inadequacy of models of intervention into interpersonal conflict for effective management of intergroup conflict.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 9, No. 4,
424-449 (1973)
DOI: 10.1177/002188637300900403

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. R. Bushe
Developing Cooperative Labor-Management Relations in Unionized Factories: A Multiple Case Study of Quality Circles and Parallel Organizations within Joint Quality of Work Life Projects
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
May 1, 1988;
24(2):
129 - 150.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. D. Brown and R. Tandon
Ideology and Political Economy in Inquiry: Action Research and Participatory Research
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
September 1, 1983;
19(3):
277 - 294.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Shirom
Toward a Theory of Organization Development Interventions in Unionized Work Settings
Human Relations,
August 1, 1983;
36(8):
743 - 763.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.B. Beaumont and D.R. Deaton
Organizational Development and Change in a Union-Management Context: The Voluntary Establishment of Joint Health and Safety Committees in Britain
Organization Studies,
January 1, 1981;
2(4):
331 - 345.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. P. Alderfer, C. J. Alderfer, L. Tucker, and R. Tucker
Diagnosing Race Relations in Management
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
April 1, 1980;
16(2):
135 - 166.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A J. Benjamin and A M. Levi
Process Minefields in Intergroup Conflict Resolution: The Sdot Yam Workshop
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
October 1, 1979;
15(4):
507 - 519.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Nadler
Hospitals, Organized Labor and Quality of Work: An Intervention Case Study
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
July 1, 1978;
14(3):
366 - 381.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Levi
Power Vs. Third Party Consultation in Conflict Management
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
October 1, 1977;
13(4):
585 - 586.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Kochan and L. Dyer
A Model of Organizational Change in the Context of Union-Management Relations
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
January 1, 1976;
12(1):
59 - 78.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. D. Brown, J. D. Aram, and D. J. Bachner
Interorganizational Information Sharing: A Successful Intervention that Failed
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
October 1, 1974;
10(4):
533 - 554.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|