The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bass, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 6, No. 2, 151-171 (1970)
DOI: 10.1177/002188637000600202

When Planning for Others

Bernard M. Bass

Management Research Center, College of Business Administration, University of Rochester.

The systems analysts presented a mathematically optimum plan to the management, but the plan is still not operational.

The plans for production call for 720 units per day, but the foreman reports averaging only 580 units daily.

The finance committee agreed to seek advice on investment strategy, but would not follow it when it was given.

The staff proposals were summarily rejected by line management as lacking in practicality.

These failures of plans to be accepted or operated effectively could have been due to a variety of reasons other than the lack of quality in the plans themselves. The systems analysts may have felt that management lacked sufficient mastery of mathematics to appreciate fully the elegance of the optimum plan, and peremptorily asked management to accept the mathematics on the analysts' authority as experts. The foreman may have regarded it as an usurpation of a management prerogative to accept suggestions for changes in plans from his workers. The investment advisers may have failed to consider adequately the fears, hopes, and expectations of those they were advising; or the staff may have found itself in a competitive struggle with line management, who in turn saw their security threatened by staff's proposals.

In the text that follows, a close look will be taken at these and other reasons for the failure of plans to be carried out, and how the likelihood of such failures might be reduced when planning for others.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Management EducationHome page
J. E. Stacey
Using the Hollow Square Exercise To Teach Ethical Concepts
Journal of Management Education, August 1, 1986; 10(3): 93 - 100.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
S. A. Stumpf and D. E. Zand
Participant Estimates of the Effectiveness of Judgmental Decisions
Journal of Management, October 1, 1981; 7(2): 77 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]