The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunnette, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, 25-44 (1969)
DOI: 10.1177/002188636900500103

People Feeling: Joy, More Joy, and the "Slough of Despond"

Marvin D. Dunnette

Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Inspiration and elation are commonly expressed outcomes of T Group experiences. Yet, compelling as such feelings may be, they are not, in themselves, sufficient for understanding what takes place in sensitivity training. To date, much research about the behavioral outcomes of T Groups has suffered from problems of faulty experimental design and imprecise measurement. We seem to be trapped in a sort of "Slough of Despond," bogged down in the mire of unsupported claims, the self-satisfaction of laboratory training advocates, and the doubt and apprehension of nonbelievers. Much of the research on interpersonal perception is summarized by our information processing model (presented here) of behavior prediction in interpersonal perception. It points up the complexities of knowing and learning to know others and summarizes many of the methodological problems which have plagued researchers. A new methodology for studying interpersonal perception judgments is described, along with results (using the new technique) showing that members of highly interactive T Groups successfully increased their skills of accurate social differentiation. It appears that greater empathy was developed in the more effective groups and that the increase was not the result simply of using strategies involving stereotypy or assumed similarity. The results support the notion that T Groups may truly help their members learn to know others better.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?