This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Nutt, P. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Assessing Downsizing Guidelines With an Exemplar

The Ohio Department of Mental Health Success Story

The Ohio State University

The propositions in two theories of downsizing are compared to a success story in an exemplary state agency: the Ohio Department of Mental Health (ODMH). ODMH was downsized, taking out a total of $150 million, with hospital closures, transfers, and mergers. A 15-year database of weekly reports to the governor of the state of Ohio recorded the actions taken in 19 closures, mergers, and transfers and their success. Propositions offered by Cameron (Cameron, 1995; Cameron and Smart, 1996) to turn aside dirty dozen outcomes and by managed de-development (Nutt, 2001; 2004) were compared to the CEO's actions documented in the histories. The findings suggest that the guidelines offered by both theories have merit. Crucial actions appear to be shifting ODMH to a lower order of organized complexity by devising a new identity to guide change with slow-paced moves to preserve core competencies that differentiated before integrating and accommodated before assimilating.

Key Words: downsizing • radical change • leadership

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 43, No. 3, 373-395 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886307300610


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?