Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plsek, P.
Right arrow Articles by Whitby, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Practical Methods for Extracting Explicit Design Rules Grounded in the Experience of Organizational Managers

Paul Plsek

Paul E. Plsek & Associates, Inc.

Joanna Bibby

Calderdale Primary Care Trust

Elaine Whitby

Greater Manchester Primary Care Trusts

The concept of design rules, an element of design science, helps convert the tacit knowledge of organizational change agents into explicit, actionable knowledge. Design rules are heuristic statements in the form: If you want to achieve outcome Y in situation S, something like X might help. Research suggests that experts tend to think using such heuristic rules, and the authors propose that this is also true for organizational managers leading successful change programs. Although design science approaches aim to build a body of design rules applicable in a variety of settings, little has been done to explore how design rules are elaborated from particular change efforts. The authors describe experience in testing four methods for extracting explicit design rules from existing programs of organizational change. They found this to be both a promising field of research and a potentially valuable methodology for practicing managers and change leaders in organizations.

Key Words: design • design rules • health care • organizational change

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 43, No. 1, 153-170 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886306297013


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
P. Bate and G. Robert
Toward More User-Centric OD: Lessons From the Field of Experience-Based Design and a Case Study
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2007; 43(1): 41 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
A. G. L. Romme and I. C. M. Damen
Toward Science-Based Design in Organization Development: Codifying the Process
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2007; 43(1): 108 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
H. Bevan, G. Robert, P. Bate, L. Maher, and J. Wells
Using a Design Approach to Assist Large-Scale Organizational Change: "10 High Impact Changes" to Improve the National Health Service in England
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2007; 43(1): 135 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]