Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Romme, A. G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Damen, I. C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Toward Science-Based Design in Organization Development

Codifying the Process

A. Georges L. Romme

Eindhoven University of Technology

Inge C. M. Damen

Tilburg University

Herbert Simon once suggested that the social sciences are actually the hard sciences due to the enormous complexity and interconnectedness of the elements within social systems. This insight is also critical in understanding the nature of change and development of large organizational systems. Adopting a science-based design approach, the authors place emphasis on the importance of developing construction principles and design rules for the implementation of large-scale organization development (OD) interventions. The empirical part of the article draws on several case studies of OD projects that employ the methods of circular redesign. The first case illustrates how implementation may fail as a result of a lack of awareness of the complexity of OD implementation and experimentation processes. The second case suggests that a coherent set of principles and rules can provide a common framework and language for scholars, managers, and consultants working together in large-scale organizational change projects.

Key Words: organization development • science-based design • design rules • codification

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 43, No. 1, 108-121 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886306297011


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
P. Bate and G. Robert
Toward More User-Centric OD: Lessons From the Field of Experience-Based Design and a Case Study
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2007; 43(1): 41 - 66.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
D. Andriessen
Designing and Testing an OD Intervention: Reporting Intellectual Capital to Develop Organizations
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2007; 43(1): 89 - 107.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
H. Bevan, G. Robert, P. Bate, L. Maher, and J. Wells
Using a Design Approach to Assist Large-Scale Organizational Change: "10 High Impact Changes" to Improve the National Health Service in England
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2007; 43(1): 135 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
P. Plsek, J. Bibby, and E. Whitby
Practical Methods for Extracting Explicit Design Rules Grounded in the Experience of Organizational Managers
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2007; 43(1): 153 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]