Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bridgman, T.
Right arrow Articles by Willmott, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Institutions and Technology

Frameworks for Understanding Organizational Change—The Case of a Major ICT Outsourcing Contract

Todd Bridgman

Hugh Willmott

University of Cambridge

The paper offers a fresh approach to the analysis of technology in organization through a critique of Orlikowski and Barley's assessment that institutional theory has the potential to bridge the social and material facets of organizational change when greater emphasis is placed on the materiality of technology. Through analysis of a major information and communication technologies outsourcing contract between UK Inland Revenue and Electronic Data Services, the authors follow institutional theory in problematizing studies in which technology is treated as a material cause or independent variable. But the approach commended by Orlikowski and Barley, they argue, is flawed by its unproblematized assumption of a separation between the physical and social aspects of technology. Drawing on the thinking of Laclau and Mouffe, the authors advocate an alternative framework that unsettles the commonsense, naturalized differentiation of the materiality of technology and the discursive field through which it is articulated and given meaning.

Key Words: institutional theory • organizational change • ICTs • discourse theory • outsourcing • actor-network theory

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 42, No. 1, 110-126 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886305284990


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Mixed Methods ResearchHome page
P. J. Scott and J. S. Briggs
A Pragmatist Argument for Mixed Methodology in Medical Informatics
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, July 1, 2009; 3(3): 223 - 241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
W. J. Orlikowski and J. Yates
ICT and Organizational Change: A Commentary
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2006; 42(1): 127 - 134.
[PDF]