The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seo, M.-G.
Right arrow Articles by Hill, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 41, No. 4, 422-443 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886305281902
© 2005 NTL Institute

Understanding the Human Side of Merger and Acquisition

An Integrative Framework

Myeong-Gu Seo

University of Maryland

N. Sharon Hill

University of Maryland

In this article, the authors identify six theories (anxiety theory, social identity theory, acculturation theory, role conflict theory, job characteristics theory, and organizational justice theory) to explain problems in managing the merger and acquisition (M&A) organizational change process. These theories have implicitly or explicitly formed the basis for the past M&A literature. The authors integrate these theories into one conceptual framework that clearly delineates unique sources of problems that can emerge in different stages of M&A integration, their psychological and behavioral effects on employees, and prescriptions to address the problems. The framework can be used as a guide for M&A integration leaders to systematically plan interventions to smooth the human integration process. It also provides a foundation for future theoretical and empirical M&A integration research.

Key Words: merger and acquisitions • organizational change • stress


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
L. Grunberg, S. Moore, E. S. Greenberg, and P. Sikora
The Changing Workplace and Its Effects: A Longitudinal Examination of Employee Responses at a Large Company
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 2008; 44(2): 215 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
S. Chreim
Social and Temporal Influences on Interpretations of Organizational Identity and Acquisition Integration: A Narrative Study
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 2007; 43(4): 449 - 480.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol RevHome page
C. E. Amiot, R. de la Sablonniere, D. J. Terry, and J. R. Smith
Integration of Social Identities in the Self: Toward a Cognitive-Developmental Model
Personality and Social Psychology Review, November 1, 2007; 11(4): 364 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
J. B. Bernerth, A. A. Armenakis, H. S. Feild, and H. J. Walker
Justice, Cynicism, and Commitment: A Study of Important Organizational Change Variables
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, September 1, 2007; 43(3): 303 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
J. W. Cox and S. Minahan
Organizational Decoration: A New Metaphor for Organization Development
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 2006; 42(2): 227 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]