Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Allison, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Corporate Health Revisited

An Update on Illness and Organizational Dynamics

Kenwyn K. Smith

David L. Eldridge

Dana S. Kaminstein

Paul D. Allison

University of Pennsylvania

This replication study explores the relationship between organizational dynamics and employee health. A previous study by Smith, Kaminstein, and Makadok found that using step-wise multiple regression, 20% of the variance of an aggregated health symptoms index administered to members of ASCORP, a financial services organization employing 13, 000 people, was accounted for by three organizational variables (organization-person balance, organizational treatment, and discrimination) after controlling for demographics. There were several methodological problems with the first study, which meant that the conclusions were cautious. Those problems were overcome in this replication study. This article is confident about the robustness of the findings. The previous study’s reporting of an R2 of. 20 was an overestimation. This replication indicates that. 15 is a more accurate figure. This is still quite high given the number of variables that affect an individual’s health.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 38, No. 2, 177-190 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/00286302038002003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?