Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nutt, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Selecting Decision Rules for Crucial Choices

An Investigation of the Thompson Framework

Paul C. Nutt

The Ohio State University

Thompson developed a framework to make strategic choices that indicates when to use optimizing, satisficing, instrumentality, and social tests as decision rules. These oft-cited prescriptions have not been empiricallyinvestigated. This studyprovides such a test by comparing the success realized when Thompson’s prescriptions were or were not followed in more than 300 strategic decisions. The findings indicate that managers followed the prescriptions in 4 of 10 decisions. Failing to follow the prescriptions led managers to applya decision rule that either developed misleading factual information or ignored available information as choices were made. Both misusing and ignoring evaluative information dramaticallylowered the prospect of success. Success improved when a decision rule was selected that adhered to the prescriptions. The implications of these findings for managers and management are discussed.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 38, No. 1, 99-131 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886302381006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
J. D. Westaby and K. N. Braithwaite
Specific Factors Underlying Reemployment Self-Efficacy: Comparing Control Belief and Motivational Reason Methods for the Recently Unemployed
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 2003; 39(4): 415 - 437.
[Abstract] [PDF]