Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erdogan, B.
Right arrow Articles by Liden, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Procedural Justice as a Two-Dimensional Construct

An Examination in the Performance Appraisal Context

Berrin Erdogan

University of Illinois at Chicago

Maria L. Kraimer

Cleveland State University

Robert C. Liden

University of Illinois at Chicago

Procedural justice is generally thought of as a unidimensional construct. In this article, it is argued that in the performance appraisal context procedural justice can be conceptualized as two-dimensional: system procedural justice and rater procedural justice. Regression results from a study of one organization in Turkey support this distinction. Due process characteristics and employee characteristics were differentially related to two dimensions of procedural justice. Specifically, perceived validity of performance criteria, knowledge of performance criteria, and organizational level of employees were related to system procedural justice, whereas perceived performance feedback and fair hearing were each positively related to rater procedural justice.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 37, No. 2, 205-222 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886301372004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
D. J. Schleicher, R. A. Bull, and S. G. Green
Rater Reactions to Forced Distribution Rating Systems
Journal of Management, August 1, 2009; 35(4): 899 - 927.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of ManagementHome page
P. E. Levy and J. R. Williams
The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future
Journal of Management, December 1, 2004; 30(6): 881 - 905.
[Abstract] [PDF]