This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Feldman, S. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Micro Matters

The Aesthetics of Power in NASA’s Flight Readiness Review

Case Western Reserve University

The primitive stuff of institutions is the individuals who staff them. This is seen in the plasticity of relations between leaders and followers. In this article, it is argued that excessive managerial control was a critical factor in determining the Challenger launch decision-making process. Specifically, it is shown that NASA’s Flight Readiness Review was ritualized through the aesthetic techniques of visualization, expectation, and repetition that intensified dependency relations. Aesthetic instruments as tools of power are a common but mostly unrecognized problem for organizational cooperation and communications. At NASA, a culture of conformity developed, characterized by the exaggerated centrality of the leader. Conflicts existed both between groups and within individuals, but these conflicts were suppressed. Recommendations are made for resolving these types of cultural problems.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 36, No. 4, 474-490 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886300364005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. P. Feldman The Culture of Objectivity: Quantification, Uncertainty, and the Evaluation of Risk at NASA Human Relations, June 1, 2004; 57(6): 691 - 718. [Abstract] [PDF]