Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipshitz, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Chic, Mystique, and Misconception

Argyris and Schön and the Rhetoric of Organizational Learning

Raanan Lipshitz

University of Haifa

Few names are more closely associated with organizational learning than those of Argyris and Schön. Nevertheless, their impact on the literature of organizational learning has been fairly tenuous. Examination of references to Argyris and Schön shows that they are frequently drafted to support an author’s or authors’ arguments rather than to be followed or critiqued ("Chic"). From an analysis of Argyris and Schön’s conceptual framework, and of their use of this framework in their consulting practice, the author suggests that the superficiality of Argyris and Schön’s influence is due to their focusing on important, attractive, but hard-to-realize aspects of organizational learning ("Mystique"). As a result, the literature overlooks some important and more feasible substantive lessons that may be learned from Argyris and Schön ("Misconception").

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 36, No. 4, 456-473 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886300364004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
C. J. Koliba and J. Lathrop
Inquiry as Intervention: Employing Action Research to Surface Intersubjective Theories-in-Use and Support an Organization's Capacity to Learn
Administration Society, March 1, 2007; 39(1): 51 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
R. Lipshitz, M. Popper, and V. J. Friedman
A Multifacet Model of Organizational Learning
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2002; 38(1): 78 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
V. J. Friedman
Designed Blindness: An Action Science Perspective on Program Theory Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation, June 1, 2001; 22(2): 161 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]