This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Argyris, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Actionable Knowledge: Design Causality in the Service of Consequential Theory

Harvard University

Knowledge produced by empirical research can have external validity, which means it is relevant to the everyday world. Actionable knowledge is that knowledge required to implement the external validity (relevance) in that world. The claim is made that the concept of causality that underlies much rigorous empirical research makes it difficult to transform knowledge with high external validity into actionable knowledge. Moreover, this concept of causality can lead to knowledge that, if made actionable, could inhibit learning and, in some cases, produce undesirable unethical consequences. A different concept of causality is proposed that enhances actionability. Design causality is defined, and how it can be implemented is illustrated.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 32, No. 4, 390-406 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886396324004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. F. Poell, L. Yorks, and V. J. Marsick Organizing Project-Based Learning in Work Contexts: A Cross-Cultural Cross Analysis of Data From Two Projects Adult Education Quarterly, November 1, 2009; 60(1): 77 - 93. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Caringi, J. Strolin-Goltzman, H. A. Lawson, M. McCarthy, K. Briar-Lawson, and N. Claiborne Child Welfare Design Teams: An Intervention to Improve Workforce Retention and Facilitate Organizational Development Research on Social Work Practice, November 1, 2008; 18(6): 565 - 574. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Trullen and J. M. Bartunek What a Design Approach Offers to Organization Development Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 2007; 43(1): 23 - 40. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Marshak and L. Heracleous A discursive approach to organization development Action Research, March 1, 2005; 3(1): 69 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Heracleous and R. J. Marshak Conceptualizing organizational discourse as situated symbolic action Human Relations, October 1, 2004; 57(10): 1285 - 1312. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Voronov and P. T. Coleman Beyond the Ivory Towers: Organizational Power Practices and a"Practical" Critical Postmodernism Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 2003; 39(2): 169 - 185. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. J. Gergen and T. J. Thatchenkery Developing Dialogue for Discerning Differences Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1996; 32(4): 428 - 433. [PDF]

				R. Sinclair and R. Hogan The Answer is Still Yes: But What was the Question? Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1996; 32(4): 434 - 440. [PDF]

				C. Argyris Actionable Knowledge: Intent versus Actuality Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1996; 32(4): 441 - 444. [PDF]

				A. F. Connell and W. R. Nord Uncertainty and Values to the Rescue Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1996; 32(4): 445 - 454. [PDF]

				W. N. Eastman and J. R. Bailey Epistemology, Action, and Rhetoric: Past and Present Connections Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1996; 32(4): 455 - 461. [PDF]