Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogan, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sinclair, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Intellectual, Ideological, and Political Obstacles to the Advancement of Organizational Science

Robert Hogan

The University of Tulsa

Robert Sinclair

The University of Tulsa

This article contends that scientific inquiry is the proper vehicle for examining organizational dynamics and promoting organizational effectiveness. However there are two sets of obstacles that hinder the development of a science of organizations. One set involves the influence of academic ideologies such as behaviorism, humanistic psychology, and postmodernist deconstruction. The other set reflects the reluctance of organizations to alter their practices based on the results of empirical research. We conclude the article with an example of a successful organizational intervention that exemplifies the main themes of the article.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 32, No. 4, 378-389 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886396324003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
K. J. Gergen and T. J. Thatchenkery
Developing Dialogue for Discerning Differences
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1996; 32(4): 428 - 433.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
R. Sinclair and R. Hogan
The Answer is Still Yes: But What was the Question?
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1996; 32(4): 434 - 440.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
C. Argyris
Actionable Knowledge: Intent versus Actuality
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1996; 32(4): 441 - 444.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
A. F. Connell and W. R. Nord
Uncertainty and Values to the Rescue
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1996; 32(4): 445 - 454.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
W. N. Eastman and J. R. Bailey
Epistemology, Action, and Rhetoric: Past and Present Connections
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 1996; 32(4): 455 - 461.
[PDF]