Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Sociotechnical System Principles and Guidelines: Past and Present

William M. Fox

University of Florida

The sociotechnical systems (STS) approach is devoted to the effective blending of both the technical and social systems of an organization. These two aspects must be considered interdependently, because arrangements that are optimal for one may not be optimal for the other and trade-offs are often required. Thus, for effective organization design, there is need for both dual focus and joint optimization. This article traces the development of STS from the presentation of its first principles by Eric Trist, its leading founder, who was guided by earlier systems thinking, research on participation, and the action research work of Kurt Lewin, to the present, including discussion of adaptations and refinements that have enhanced its applicability to nonmanufacturing organizations. The approach has more relevance today than ever before, as organizational personnel seek more fruitful means of empowerment and as their organizations strive for greater productivity and viability in increasingly turbulent environments.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 31, No. 1, 91-105 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886395311009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. I. Westbrook, J. Braithwaite, A. Georgiou, A. Ampt, N. Creswick, E. Coiera, and R. Iedema
Multimethod Evaluation of Information and Communication Technologies in Health in the Context of Wicked Problems and Sociotechnical Theory
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 746 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
M. I. Harrison, R. Koppel, and S. Bar-Lev
Unintended Consequences of Information Technologies in Health Care An Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2007; 14(5): 542 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
F. Cheyunski and J. Millard
Accelerated Business Transformation and the Role of the Organization Architect
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, September 1, 1998; 34(3): 268 - 285.
[Abstract] [PDF]