Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by John, C. St.
Right arrow Articles by Winston, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Effect of Social Support on Prenatal Care

Craig St. John

Department of Sociology at the University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019

Terry J. Winston

Oklahoma State Department of Corrections, 3400 Martin Luther King Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73136.

This article examines the effects of social support on the receipt of adequate prenatal care. A study was conducted to test the hypotheses that social support helps women overcome obstacles to obtaining such care, and that social support has greater effects on women facing the most obstacles. Survey data were gathered for more than 90% of the women who gave birth in Oklahoma hospitals during specific periods in the summer of 1986. The authors found only weak support for the first hypothesis, and for the second hypothesis found only support that must be qualified according to the measure of social support. Strong evidence indicates, however, that difficulty in paying for prenatal care, personal inconveniences, and unwanted pregnancies are obstacles to obtaining such care. The findings account for some of the frequently observed demographic differences associated with receipt of adequate prenatal care, although such differences persisted even after the obstacles were considered. The authors present implications for policy makers seeking to improve women's receipt of adequate prenatal care.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 25, No. 1, 79-98 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886389251006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
E. C. Kieffer, S. K. Willis, N. Arellano, and R. Guzman
Perspectives of Pregnant and Postpartum Latino Women on Diabetes, Physical Activity, and Health
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2002; 29(5): 542 - 556.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
C. Strawn
Beyond the Buzz Word: Empowerment in Community Outreach and Education
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 1994; 30(2): 159 - 174.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
S. T. Myers and H. G. Grasmick
The Social Rights and Responsibilities of Pregnant Women: An Application of Parsons's Sick Role Model
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, May 1, 1990; 26(2): 157 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]