Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Young, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Controlling Multiple F Test Errors with an Overall F Test

Harold J. Fletcher

Department of Educational Research, 307-H Stone Building, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 323/06.

Haydn Daw

Jane Young

Department of Physical Education at the University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 336200.

This article presents a theoretical extension of the problem associated with multiple comparisons among means-the increasing rate of false rejection errors-to multiple F tests of effects in multifactor ANOVAs and regression analyses. The authors empirically confirmed the prediction of such errors through an experiment in which 32% of 100 random computer-generated three-factor ANOVAs had one or more false rejections for the usual seven F tests for main and interaction effects (30% were expected), yet only 6% of the overall F ratios-which tested all effects simultaneously-were falsely declared significant (5% were expected). In contrast, the Bonferroni procedure produced false rejections in 11% of the ANOVAs. The authors conclude that researchers can control the predictable rates of false rejection of errors inherent in multifactor analyses by extending the Fisher protection procedure and requiring the overall F to be significant. The article concludes with hypothetical experiments illustrating how researchers can use the procedure.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 25, No. 1, 101-108 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886389251008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
J. D. Kromrey and W. B. Dickinson
The Use of an Overall F Test to Control Type I Error Rates in Factorial Analyses of Variance: Limitations and Better Strategies
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 1995; 31(1): 51 - 64.
[Abstract] [PDF]