This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bullock, R. J. Articles by Svyantek, D. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Impossibility of Using Random Strategies to Study the Organization Development Process

Houston, Texas

Daniel J. Svyantek

University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325.

The organization development (OD) process seeks collaborative, diagnosis-based organizational change. This article discusses how the use of random strategies of a traditional experimental design to study the OD process fundamentally changes that process to something other than OD. Following a literature search, the authors conclude that random processes and the OD process are fundamentally incompatible and thus cannot be used simultaneously. Researchers may use random strategies to study OD techniques, but not the OD process itself It is never appropriate to attempt to use random selection or random assignment to study the OD process. The authors call for the development of alternative standards and methods that are both rigorous and relevant to OD research for no true experiment studying the OD process can ever take place.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 23, No. 2, 255-262 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886387232008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Rodgers and J. E. Hunter The Methodological War of the "Hardheads" versus the "Softheads" Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, June 1, 1996; 32(2): 189 - 208. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. Svyantek, M. S. O'Connell, and T. L. Baumgardner Applications of Bayesian Methods to OD Evaluation and Decision Making Human Relations, June 1, 1992; 45(6): 621 - 636. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. A. Israel, S. J. Schurman, and M. K. Hugentobler Conducting Action Research: Relationships between Organization Members and Researchers Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 1992; 28(1): 74 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. J. Bullock and M. E. Tubbs A Case Meta-Analysis of Gainsharing Plans as Organization Development Interventions Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, August 1, 1990; 26(3): 383 - 404. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. W. Woodman Organizational Change and Development: New Arenas for Inquiry and Action Journal of Management, June 1, 1989; 15(2): 205 - 228. [Abstract] [PDF]