Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bramel, D.
Right arrow Articles by Friend, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Work Group and its Vicissitudes in Social and Industrial Psychology

Dana Bramel

State University of New York at Stony Brook; Stony Brook New York 11794

Ronald Friend

State University of New York at Stony Brook; Stony Brook New York 11794

At various times the small group in the work place has been seen as either the organization's means of controlling workers or a response to increasing power and demands. This article analyzes shifts in social science research and theory on these groups, illustrating this ambivalence by discussing the attitudes of Le Bon, Taylor, Allport, Mayo, Sherif, Lewin, and others. The authors then present a historical survey of the image and reality of work groups during 1935-1981, which they found depended on the relative power of labor and capital as indicated by strikes and employment rates in specific periods. At times when worker power peaked, democratic, group-oriented methods were advocated, when worker power declined, individualistic, authoritative approaches prevailed The authors conclude that as more psychologists become unionized the needs of workers rather than management-particularly alienating work conditions and harmful consequences of lack of worker control-could be an increasing focus of their attention.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 23, No. 2, 233-253 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/0021886387232007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
K. L. Bettenhausen
Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed
Journal of Management, June 1, 1991; 17(2): 345 - 381.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management Communication QuarterlyHome page
P. G. Friedman
Upstream Facilitation: A Proactive Approach to Managing Problem-Solving Groups
Management Communication Quarterly, August 1, 1989; 3(1): 33 - 50.
[Abstract]