|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Common Behavior Changes in Successful Organization Development Efforts
Jerry I. Porras
Graduate School of Business at Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.
Susan J. Hoffer
Finding that the field of organization development (OD) suffers from a lack of a unifying theory ofplanned organizational change and the difficulty of integrating research based on diverse methods and models, the authors propose a model in which on-the-job behaviors of organization members act as important mediating variables of organizational change. The article discusses a study seeking to identify and specify common behavior changes characteristic of successful change efforts. The authors surveyed 42 of the top scholars and practitioners in the field, using telephone interviews and open-ended questions. The participants nearly unanimously reported behavior changes common to their interventions and showed at least moderate agreement as to what those changes were. Furthermore, the participants' theoretical orientations and professional affiliations did not cause them to differ as to the behaviors they reported.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 22, No. 4,
477-494 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/002188638602200409

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Ford and B. M. Greer
Profiling Change: An Empirical Study of Change Process Patterns
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
December 1, 2006;
42(4):
420 - 446.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. B Lopopolo
The Relationship of Role-Related Variables to Job Satisfaction and Commitment to the Organization in a Restructured Hospital Environment
Physical Therapy,
October 1, 2002;
82(10):
984 - 999.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Bate, R. Khan, and A. Pye
Towards A Culturally Sensitive Approach To Organization Structuring: Where Organization Design Meets Organization Development
Organization Science,
March 1, 2000;
11(2):
197 - 211.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Bartunek, D. N. Greenberg, and B. Davidson
Consistent and Inconsistent Impacts of a Teacher-Led Empowerment Initiative in a Federation of Schools
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
December 1, 1999;
35(4):
457 - 478.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. B Lopopolo
Hospital Restructuring and the Changing Nature of the Physical Therapist's Role
Physical Therapy,
February 1, 1999;
79(2):
171 - 185.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. Bazigos and W. W. Burke
Theory Orientations of Organization Development (OD) Practitioners
Group Organization Management,
September 1, 1997;
22(3):
384 - 408.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. O'Driscoll and J. L. Eubanks
Behavioral Competencies, Goal Setting, and OD Practitioner Effectiveness
Group Organization Management,
September 1, 1993;
18(3):
308 - 327.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Covin and R. H. Kilmann
Participant Perceptions of Positive and Negative Influences on Large-Scale Change
Group Organization Management,
June 1, 1990;
15(2):
233 - 248.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. C. Wooten and L. P. White
Toward a Theory of Change Role Efficacy
Human Relations,
August 1, 1989;
42(8):
651 - 669.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. W. Woodman
Organizational Change and Development: New Arenas for Inquiry and Action
Journal of Management,
June 1, 1989;
15(2):
205 - 228.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Bartunek and M. K. Moch
First-Order, Second-Order, and Third-Order Change and Organization Development Interventions: A Cognitive Approach
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
December 1, 1987;
23(4):
483 - 500.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|