Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gavin, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Observations from a Long-Term, Survey-Guided Consultation with a Mining Company

James F. Gavin

Centre for Human Relations and Community Studies at Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G IM8.

During a nine-year period, consultants conducted four attitude surveys with increasing levels of employee involvement in making feedback-guided behavioral science interventions with a large underground mining company. This consultation pattern emerged not from a conscious plan by the organization or its consultants but from a step-wise progression based on the successes and failures of previous interventions. The consultants derived models for the consultation process and survey-guided development from an adaptation of action research to OD interventions and from Argyris's perspectives on intervention, including his more recent analysis of "theories in action." This article describes the activities and progress that occurred during the period of the consultation, and the author discusses the changing organizational processes and the plausibility of linking them to organizational effectiveness and health criteria.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, 201-220 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/002188638502100211


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
R. Lipshitz
Chic, Mystique, and Misconception: Argyris and Schon and the Rhetoric of Organizational Learning
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, December 1, 2000; 36(4): 456 - 473.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
B. A. Israel, S. J. Schurman, and M. K. Hugentobler
Conducting Action Research: Relationships between Organization Members and Researchers
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, March 1, 1992; 28(1): 74 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of ManagementHome page
M. Sashkin and W. W. Burke
Organization Development in the 1980's
Journal of Management, June 1, 1987; 13(2): 393 - 417.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
R. Sommer
An Experimental Investigation of the Action Research Approach
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, May 1, 1987; 23(2): 185 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]