Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kihl, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Viability of Public Hearings in Transportation Planning

Mary R. Kihl

College of Design at Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.

Despite the development of numerous new techniques of citizen participation, and continued criticism of public hearings, hearings are still the predominant vehicle for citizen involvement in transportation planning. To review the effectiveness of hearings more objectively, the study discussed in this article employed content analysis to examine the transcripts of more than 30 hearings conducted in Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri during the design stage of proposed highway improvements. The resulting analysis assessed the level of citizen frustration evident at the meetings and provided support for a more positive view of public hearings or at least those conducted in the target area. The hearings reviewed invited participation by citizens with a wide range of interests and concerns, and they helped to further understanding of if not agreement on specific highway projects.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, 185-200 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/002188638502100210


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
N. Roberts
Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation
The American Review of Public Administration, December 1, 2004; 34(4): 315 - 353.
[Abstract] [PDF]