Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rubinstein, D.
Right arrow Articles by Woodman, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Spiderman and the Burma Raiders: Collateral Organization Theory in Action

David Rubinstein

Richard W. Woodman

College of Business Administration, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843.

A collateral organization is designed to co-exist parallel with the formal organization on a relatively permanent basis. Proponents contend that collateral organizations prove especially valuable in supplementing the formal organization because they provide (1) a means for identifying, analyzing, and mastering ill-structured problems and (2) an arena for participation. Advocates concede, however, that the parallel arrangement offormal and collateral organizations creates a complexity that may confuse participants and cause role problems.

To the contrary, this article argues that the proclaimed "advantages" of collateral organizations are problematic while their "problems" actually provide the paramount advantage. Despite claims by proponents, a collateral organization is (1) not inherently a proficient medium for solving-or even seeing-ill-structured problems, and (2) is no less prone to abuse of participation than other participatory forms. Yet collateral organizations offer the invaluable advantage of complex role sets-i.e., interaction opportunities with a large number of very different people. Complex role sets may enhance mastery of the environment for both individuals and organizations.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1-16 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/002188638402000104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceHome page
G. R. Bushe
Developing Cooperative Labor-Management Relations in Unionized Factories: A Multiple Case Study of Quality Circles and Parallel Organizations within Joint Quality of Work Life Projects
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, May 1, 1988; 24(2): 129 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
A. B. Shani and B. J. Eberhardt
Parallel Organization in a Health Care Institution: An Exploratory Action Research Study
Group Organization Management, June 1, 1987; 12(2): 147 - 173.
[Abstract]


Home page
Group Organization ManagementHome page
G. R. Bushe
Temporary or Permanent Middle-Management Groups?: Correlates With Attitudes in Qwl Change Projects
Group Organization Management, March 1, 1987; 12(1): 23 - 37.
[Abstract]