This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, P. B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The T-Group Trainer: Group Facilitator or Prisoner of Circumstance?

School of Social Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, E. Sussex, England, BN1 9QN.

In this study of 31 English T Groups, trainers were reported to be more influential, more trusted and more likely to create tension than were members. An index of group outcome was found to correlate significantly with high trainer influence and high trust in the trainer. However, effective trainer behavior also showed substantial variation between different types of T Group. In low tension groups, trainers whose behavior made others tense were more effective, whereas in high tension groups the reverse was true. Seven trainers within the sample conducted more than one group. When these groups were compared, there was no evidence that particular trainers tend to create in their groups a climate of a consistent type. It was concluded that the culture of a group depended primarily on the group's composition. Some trainer behaviors, such as supportive ones, were effective across a wide range of group types. Others, such as confronting behavior, were effective only where the trainer correctly diagnosed its appropriateness to the group culture.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, 63-77 (1980)
DOI: 10.1177/002188638001600106


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?