|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Domain Theory: An Introduction to Oganizational Behavior in Human Service Organizations
James M. Kouzes
Joint Center for Human Services Development, San Jose State University
Paul R. Mico
Third Party Associates, Inc., Oakland, California
The dominant paradigm of organizations, on which organization development (OD) is based, is industry-specific in theory and practice. The traditional manner by which OD technology has been transferred to the human services field presumes that the same theories and practices prevail here as well. The authors challenge this presumption. They suggest that the behavior of human services organizations (HSOs) is based on a fundamentally different paradigm, which necessitates both a new organizational theory and a different OD practice. The authors introduce and discuss a theory of organizational behavior in HSOs, integrating their own experiences with the works of Bell, Jaques, Weick, Weisbord, and others. They suggest that HSOs are comprised of three distinct domains-the Policy Domain, the Management Domain, and the Service Domain. They maintain that each domain operates by different and contrasting principles, success measures, structural arrangements, and work modes, and that the interactions between these create natural conditions of disjunction and discordance. This paradigm of conflicting domains can serve as a new conceptual guide to OD in HSOs, as well as aid to the development and refinement of new OD methods and tools specific to these organizations.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 15, No. 4,
449-469 (1979)
DOI: 10.1177/002188637901500402

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bradburn
Book Reviews
Educational Management Administration Leadership,
July 1, 2003;
31(3):
340 - 342.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Usherwood
Local politics and the public library service
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,
September 1, 1994;
26(3):
135 - 140.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Margetts and L. Willcocks
Information Technology as Policy Instrument in the UK Social Security System: Delivering an Operational Strategy
International Review of Administrative Sciences,
September 1, 1992;
58(3):
329 - 347.
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Gerbert, B. Maguire, V. Badner, D. Altman, and G. Stone
Why Fear Persists: Health Care Professionals and AIDS
JAMA,
December 16, 1988;
260(23):
3481 - 3483.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Brazell
Doctors as Managers
Management Learning,
July 1, 1987;
18(2):
95 - 102.
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Hoffman and V. J. Webb
Perceived Effectiveness of the Chicago Crime Commission, 1980-1985: Insiders and Outsiders
Criminal Justice Review,
September 1, 1986;
11(2):
1 - 8.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Moosbruker
OD with a Community Mental Health Center: A Case of Building Structures Patiently
Group Organization Management,
March 1, 1983;
8(1):
45 - 59.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Martinko and P. D. Tolchinsky
Critical Issues for Planned Change in Human Service Organizations: A Case Study and Analysis
Group Organization Management,
June 1, 1982;
7(2):
179 - 192.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Mullen and B. H. Leifer
Promoting Employee Acceptance of a Consumer Bill of Rights in a Complex Medical Care Organization: A Case Study
Health Educ Behav,
January 1, 1982;
9(1):
3 - 22.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Mullen and J. G. Zapka
Health Education and Promotion in HMOs: The Recent Evidence
Health Educ Behav,
January 1, 1981;
8(4):
292 - 315.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|