|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Evaluation Methodology in Organization Development: An Analysis and Critique
Jerry I. Porras
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University
Per Olaf Berg
University of Lund, Sweden
The purpose of this analysis is to present a detailed overview of the current state of evaluation methodology in organization development. A detailed search procedure yielded 35 empirical studies in the OD field for the period 1959 to mid-1975. Each study was analyzed according to (a) research design, (b) data collection procedures, (c) subject characteristics, (d) treatment dimensions, and (e) data analysis approaches. Findings show that the overall quality of OD research methodology was spotty. Research designs were relatively strong with a large percentage of investigators using quasi-experimental designs. An excessive reliance on questionnaires as the sole data collection approach exists. Only a small percentage of studies report using other quantified approaches. Most studies were conducted in one organization or in situations where the N's for units of analysis larger than the individual were small (< 10). The heavy use of laboratory training intervention techniques was noted, although a strong shift from process to task orientation has occurred in recent years. Over 75% of the studies reported the use of statistical tests of significance. Although data analysis procedures are becoming more sophisticated, the vast majority of studies used very simple analytical techniques. Based on this analysis, a series of suggestions for improvement of methodological approaches to OD research is presented.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 14, No. 2,
151-173 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/002188637801400202
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
L. E. Greiner and T. G. Cummings
Wanted: OD More Alive Than Dead!
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
December 1, 2004;
40(4):
374 - 391.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Rodgers and J. E. Hunter
The Methodological War of the "Hardheads" versus the "Softheads"
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
June 1, 1996;
32(2):
189 - 208.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C. Wooten and L. P. White
Toward a Theory of Change Role Efficacy
Human Relations,
August 1, 1989;
42(8):
651 - 669.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. N. Tennis
Responses to the Alpha, Beta, Gamma Change Typology: Cultural Resistance To Change
Group Organization Management,
June 1, 1989;
14(2):
134 - 149.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. Armenakis and H. B. Burdg
Consultation Research: Contributions to Practice and Directions for Improvement
Journal of Management,
June 1, 1988;
14(2):
339 - 365.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sashkin and W. W. Burke
Organization Development in the 1980's
Journal of Management,
June 1, 1987;
13(2):
393 - 417.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Bullock and D. J. Svyantek
The Impossibility of Using Random Strategies to Study the Organization Development Process
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
May 1, 1987;
23(2):
255 - 262.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. Armenakis, M. R. Buckley, and A. G. Bedeian
Survey Research Measurement Issues in Evaluating Change : A Laboratory Investigation
Applied Psychological Measurement,
June 1, 1986;
10(2):
147 - 157.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. P. Steel and G. S. Shane
Evaluation Research on Quality Circles: Technical and Analytical Implications
Human Relations,
May 1, 1986;
39(5):
449 - 466.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gallessich
Toward a Meta-Theory of Consultation
The Counseling Psychologist,
July 1, 1985;
13(3):
336 - 354.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Kurpius
Consultation Interventions: Successes, Failures, and Proposals
The Counseling Psychologist,
July 1, 1985;
13(3):
368 - 389.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. B. Pond III, A. A. Armenakis, and S. B. Green
The Importance of Employee Expectations in Organizational Diagnosis
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
April 1, 1984;
20(2):
167 - 180.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Blumberg and C. D. Pringle
How Control Groups Can Cause Loss of Control in Action Research: The Case of Rushton Coal Mine
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
December 1, 1983;
19(4):
409 - 425.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. E. Terpstra
Evaluating Selected Organization Development Interventions: The State of the Art
Group Organization Management,
December 1, 1982;
7(4):
402 - 417.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. C. Roberts and J. I. Porras
Progress in Organization Development Research
Group Organization Management,
March 1, 1982;
7(1):
91 - 116.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Hopkins
Survey Feedback as an Organisation Development Intervention in Educational Settings: a Review
Educational Management Administration Leadership,
January 1, 1982;
10(3):
203 - 215.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. F. Paul and A. C. Gross
Increasing Productivity and Morale in a Municipality: Effects of Organization Development
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
January 1, 1981;
17(1):
59 - 78.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. S. Crawford, E. D. Thomas, and J. J. Fink
Pygmalion at Sea: Improving the Work Effectiveness of Low Performers
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
October 1, 1980;
16(4):
482 - 505.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. I. Porras and A. Wilkins
Organization Development in a Large System: An Empirical Assessment
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
October 1, 1980;
16(4):
506 - 534.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Fullan, M. B. Miles, and G. Taylor
Organization Development in Schools: The State of the Art
Review of Educational Research,
January 1, 1980;
50(1):
121 - 183.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Koch and S. R. Rhodes
Problems with Reactive Instruments in Field Research
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
October 1, 1979;
15(4):
485 - 506.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. I. Porras
The Comparative Impact of Different OD Techniques and Intervention Intensities
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
April 1, 1979;
15(2):
156 - 178.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. I. Porras and K. Patterson
Assessing Planned Change
Group Organization Management,
March 1, 1979;
4(1):
39 - 58.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
