Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orum, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

On Participation in Political Protest Movements

Anthony M. Orum

Department of Sociology, The University of Texas at Austin.

Laymen and social scientists alike often believe that people are inspired to participate in political or social movements because of certain dislocating or frustrating personal experiences. The political protests of recent years have been interpreted in terms of similar ideas and formalized in five currently popular theories on the origins of political protest: status inconsistency, cumulative deprivation, relative deprivation, rising expectations, and social isolation. I review a large body of empirical evidence concerning each theory and find, at best, only limited support for them. Next I present some general reasons why the theories may be either inadequate or only partially correct. And, finally, I suggest a novel approach to the explanation and prediction of participation in political movements, portrayed in the form of a path-analytic scheme which can be employed in future empirical research.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 10, No. 2, 181-207 (1974)
DOI: 10.1177/002188637401000206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
D. E. TAYLOR
The Rise of the Environmental Justice Paradigm: Injustice Framing and the Social Construction of Environmental Discourses
American Behavioral Scientist, January 1, 2000; 43(4): 508 - 580.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
A. M. Orum
Almost a Half Century of Political Sociology: Trends in the United States
Current Sociology, December 1, 1996; 44(3): 132 - 151.



Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. K. BURTON
DILEMMAS OF ORGANIZING WOMEN OFFICE WORKERS
Gender Society, December 1, 1987; 1(4): 432 - 446.
[Abstract]


Home page
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector QuarterlyHome page
D. L. Uzzell
Conflicting Explanations of Participatory Group Membership
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, January 1, 1980; 9(1-4): 203 - 210.